It was just a question of time. We have repeatedly wrote here about how the current photo licensing model is broken and obsolete . We also explained at full length how image data collection and third-party revenue are the new gold mine. Getty apparently heard and is now applying. (If you want to read how it works, there is a great full explanation here)
Getty Images announcement today that it has put 35 Million of its 80 million images up for free is no surprise. Here’s why .
The battle against copyright infringement has been lost : Between the ease to copy and publish, the rapid rise of various massive social media site, the sharing culture, the inefficacy of the industry to police and the overall carelessness of the public, defending copyright is a costly, ineffective battle. Going after hundreds of thousands ( if not millions) of bloggers, or just individuals sharing on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Whatsapp, Tumblr, blogs is an impossible task. Since there is no revenue, it is a draining exercise with no incentive. Take down notices does not pay your bills. Better make deals with social media platforms, like Getty did with Pinterest, and let the images flow.
Plunging prices is not a growth factor. For decades now, the price for images online has been plummeting. Between a race to the bottom competition amongst image providers and the massive influx of free images from UGC, there is no pressure to increase licensing prices. Quite the opposite. At a certain level, the cost of selling an image is higher than the licensing price. Getty, apparently, has reached that point. Why dedicate resources to selling images under your profit level? Sometimes something is not better than nothing.
Photography’s real value: For a long time, the thinking was that the images themselves had value. And this is still true for some of them. However ever since we have been able to track images and their usage, the value of the image has shifted to its traction. By analyzing viewers reactions to the content of an image, we can create images that have much more impact. The first step is to capture this data. We wrote at length about this here.
The 80/20 rule: Only probably 20 % of the images that Getty represents bring them 80% of their revenue. So why apply the same pricing to all its collection when the vast majority of images probably never sell or if they do, it’s for ridiculous amounts. Those 35 million images put up for free probably would have never seen the light of day. Getty Images, like all traditional stock agencies, is not in the long tail business but in the best seller business. The 20%. This move allows them to start harvesting the long tail.
Reduce and automate: Licensing images it is still a very manual hand-holding process, especially in the rights managed world. Furthermore, if you want to keep your prices high, you need higher quality service. It’s a labor intensive process and it’s a costly process. Thousands upon thousands of employees. That is not scalable. Getty has been battling this issue for many years now: how to grow without growing the headcount. Automation is the answer. Letting users pick and post images by themselves and getting revenue via ads will let them do this.
What will be the effect of Getty’s decision on the overall image licensing market?
At first, nothing. It is such a bold, surprising move that no one will move. They will wait and see what happens while investigating their options. Most will not change, some will put a toe into a copycat model, and some might join them. But, because this service will primarily be used in the very low-end of the market space, one that has been underserved by everyone else, no one will be really affected. at first. If Getty manages to be successful in their attempt, it will be too late for any one else to replicate and beat them at their own game. They will have a first mover advantage that will stick.
No one in this space can really compete with Getty on this move. The only one would be Corbis due to their very large database, but their management has notoriously been so ineffective that it will take them years to process. Associated Press might follow suit, as lately, they have increased their competition against Getty. Both, however, have very different contributors’ agreements that might forbid them to proceed the same way.
Either way, as long as Getty does not monetize this, it will probably have little to no effect on the marketplace since, the way it is set up, it is not useful for fortune 500’s of publishing. However, Getty could easily come out with a pro version that will. If anything, Getty’s announcement might give Shutterstock’s stock a beating in trading for a few days.
The photo licensing world as we know it is not going to die because of this, at least not yet. Embedding images is a cumbersome process and Getty has voluntarily not made it easier. Unlike with video, it is not a necessary step with photos. Without any incentive, beside posting legal images – which, as we have seen, is not an incentive – it offers no real benefits for users. Adoption, in my experience ( We had offered this model years ago in a photo agency I used to run), will be low and small.
The big unknown here is how Getty contributors will react. Obviously, they will not see a penny for a while on this deal and some might get very upset that their images are being offered for free. There will certainly be a backlash that Getty certainly anticipates and are ready to handle. Their strategy here might be that they do not care if they leave ( after all, those are the images that do not sell well) or that they have nowhere else to go.
Image licensing finally enters the XXI century:
Getty’s move, while seemingly bold, is in a fact, a natural evolution. The old method of image licensing, exchanging a penny against a file, is dying because it doesn’t respond to market needs anymore. Everyone is a publisher today and everyone needs pictures. Denying them access to your library because of cost, or complicated licensing format, is not a successful approach. What you want is to give them the easiest tools possible for them to use your images easily and then reap the benefits. Facilitate usage first, collect revenue second. Because everything online can scale massively rapidly, even if each image brings a few pennies, it can add up to a large amount. And if you can keep cost low by automating, you have a winning proposition.
It is also natural for Getty to get access to usage data. Today photo licensing companies can only analyze buying patterns. Who buys what images. They are blind as far as how their images are used, and most importantly, how viewers react to them. Which, if you think of it, should be their number one concern. Collecting and analyzing that data in order to create a more calibrated offering is what a modern photo-licensing company should be doing. And what Getty is going after.
Pingback: Getty Image’s Gamble | Thoughts of a Bohe...
#PhotoMarket Getty Image’s gamble | @melchp – Thoughts of a Bohemian – http://t.co/MqbXQOFsUF #NoContentForFree
Meg Handler liked this on Facebook.
Mark Milstein liked this on Facebook.
Robert Henson liked this on Facebook.
Thoughts of a Bohemian http://t.co/wIrDNANjRY :: Getty Image’s Gamble
“It is such a bold, surprising move that no one [in the industry] will move.” –@melchp’s take on yesterday’s news: http://t.co/0jeWX4laWG
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/jT8ViLE80O via @melchp
Dare L Rot liked this on Facebook.
RT @agebhard: “It is such a bold, surprising move that no one [in the industry] will move.” –@melchp’s take on yesterday’s news: http://t.c…
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/EZHZaDF19y
RT @theclick: Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/EZHZaDF19y
Big changes in the photo world Part 2 http://t.co/UyYjHeD6RI
Joel Halioua liked this on Facebook.
Greg Aslangul liked this on Facebook.
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/GJiJ2Y167U
RT @agebhard: “It is such a bold, surprising move that no one [in the industry] will move.” –@melchp’s take on yesterday’s news: http://t.c…
“They will have a first mover advantage that will stick.” Best write up I’ve seen on this. http://t.co/qpVzO4LqYd
free photos! my oh my: http://t.co/LRemW9ijfK
If #Getty succeeds with new free embed depends on what contributors do…getty banking on they will stay. http://t.co/wyDTPz3WyX
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/ttSKfPsIDo via @melchp
Interesting read: Has the battle against copyright infringement been lost? http://t.co/AH9iE5XJg5
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/pphcaT5CrU via @melchp
@GettyImages how about photographers/the actual value of their work? Is this all they’re worth? Not even the mention? http://t.co/Dr4eRZ2fZ2
Hi Paul, read your article in full, while thought provoking, I don’t agree with many points.
Although this move doesn’t affect me much, as I’ve only a small collection through Aurora (distributed through Getty). I do feel passionately for the rights of other photographers and feel this deal is in fact in detriment of these rights.
This move pulls the stick of control, much further from the content providers hands. It is widely accepted in the stock community that social media is a necessary evil of today’s business. If you post images online and for sale, it is likely your image will land on social media where it will be reposted, saved, edited, cropped, distorted or worse.
This deal will surly increase the lack of control image providers already have in this already unstable market, and worse still, with little reassurance of any remittance from now and into the future.
If Getty felt the need to tap into this market, I believe it should have been done with a paid model similar to Yay’s Steaming subscriptions. At least the suppliers would have a little something in return instead of a flat nothing.
Ryan, I understand why you are upset. The reality has been for a while that photo agencies have been moving away from what’s good for their photographers to what’s good for them. In fact, many years ago, Getty dropped the term Photo agency to a distributor. While they might have their contributors interest in sight, it is easily ignored for their own . Getty takes care of Getty first, contributors second. Business wise, this is perfectly normal. All successful companies proceed the same way.
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/Bt6TT1x3BN via @melchp
RT @Yunghi: If #Getty succeeds with new free embed depends on what contributors do…getty banking on they will stay. http://t.co/wyDTPz3WyX
Pingback: Getty Image’s Gamble | Livres photo | Sco...
Getty Image’s Gamble | Thoughts of a Bohemian http://t.co/7tavJ8fQ48
Great article, http://t.co/hbghPta4Wd #GettyImages
Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/JmKbzrMHYk via @melchp
RT @MicrostockExp: Getty Image’s Gamble http://t.co/JmKbzrMHYk via @melchp
Getty Image’s Gamble This has real interesting possibilities if Getty will pay pennies to #photogs http://t.co/VnDsFPq3ZA via @melchp
Pingback: Getty Images Releases a Free Option and Creates a Strategic Option