We have been advocating the emergence of the “intelligent image” here for many years. Images that are able to call back home to deliver pertinent data, images that can automatically find their way to the expecting viewers, images that can self edit according to viewership and a lot more.
Some aspects are already in circulation in one form or another. Companies like Fotoglif or Embedanything, for example, already allow licensors to track number of visits on a published image and eventually reap revenues from associated advertising.
Daylife, partly owned by Getty Images, allow sites to bypass photo editors and have images edit themselves based on surrounding content.
Now, thanks to a company called Netbat ( What’s with all the horrible stupid names ?), images can be linked to any and all relevant information, thus making them even more informative.
The process is simple. When a image is published, it is also populated with links for more information on the subject, being at Youtube, Wikipedia, or any other sources. Thus the image becomes the starting point for a relevant web-wide search on the topic.
The company apparent business plan is to sell that search link space to advertisers so that topic/subject can be linked to a brand. Already Pepsi has signed up. Instead of advertising on random images, netBat can make sure a brand is always associated to a personality or a topic and nothing more/less. It’s not a big surprise as the parent company of netBat is in the business of selling celebrity endorsement. But that is not what is interesting here.
What is interesting here is how, once again, a company from outside the photogrpahy space, find another way to monetize images . While countless of photo agencies and independent photographers are moaning and bitching about the declining space rates/ day rates / whatever rates being offered in the traditional licensing space, other companies are hard at work in redefining paying usage of photography.
NetBat, like Pixazza, another image monetizing company (this one partly owned by Google), has no intention of splitting revenues with image licensors. For them, once an image has been licensed by a publisher, the licensor is out of the profit sharing scheme.
Thing is, photo agencies should be the ones offering these services to their clients, not third party companies. It would make sense for a photo agency to offer a tool like NetBat that would allow visitors to go beyond the metadata. To transform their offering to a vast array of option that are up to pace with current and upcoming technology.
Currently, besides having painfully switched from analog to digital, none are being pro active in redefining image delivery and licensing. Some have timidly put a toe into third party initiative but none have taken a full plunged into uncharted territory.
We are not saying netBat will be a success. Actually, it is so heavy, it is doubtful it will ever be. However, the idea of helping viewers to go beyond the image is a great concept. One that fits perfectly with the unstoppable maturing of photography into an intelligent experience that can take you places far beyond it’s current solitary confinement.
OK. so what about PhotoShelter. It automatically uses Picscout.
Picscout tracks copyright infringement : No intelligence there.
Update : Sorry, I thought you were talking about Picscout tracking service. Yes, Picscout ImageExchange is a great example of an intelligent image calling home. Photoshelter is certainly to be added in those companies looking to help images find their clients. Thanks for that !!