Categories
- alexa (7)
- Aurora (7)
- Canada (10)
- celebrity (121)
- CEPIC (30)
- Cnn (7)
- commercial stock (165)
- copyright (83)
- corbis (136)
- Corpocrates (13)
- Cosmos (3)
- digg (5)
- E Reader (13)
- editorial (360)
- filter (33)
- finance (144)
- flickr (91)
- focus (32)
- france (50)
- getty (240)
- Good Enough (9)
- google (58)
- gumgum (11)
- HOLGA (10)
- idee (17)
- IPTC (28)
- Jupiter (27)
- keyword (65)
- law (59)
- lens (39)
- lensbabies (9)
- license (214)
- magazine (197)
- Magnum (17)
- mediastorm (18)
- Microstock (171)
- Midstock (36)
- msnbc.com (14)
- multimedia (89)
- news (174)
- newspaper (79)
- Newsweek (17)
- No sense (63)
- PACA (26)
- Pacific coast news (8)
- photojournalism (247)
- Photoplus (3)
- photoshop (13)
- Piclens (3)
- pictogram (3)
- picturemaxx (2)
- Plus (10)
- prosumer (91)
- Royalty free (110)
- Search (109)
- SIPA (15)
- slideshow (78)
- Social Media (21)
- technology (236)
- TIME (36)
- transaction (158)
- Tweet (7)
- Uncategorized (27)
- Waste of time (8)
- web 2.0 (159)
- wire service (43)
- yahoo (14)
- Zymmetrical (6)
Latest Postings
- February 7, 2012: Photography is killing photography
- January 25, 2012: iTune it
- December 14, 2011: How Empires fall
- December 7, 2011: Match it
- November 10, 2011: For whom the mallet falls
- November 1, 2011: The $$ Festival
- October 25, 2011: Algorithmic Photography
- October 21, 2011: A 100 years of solitude
- October 5, 2011: Requiem for a Giant
- September 25, 2011: For a buck or two
Links
Blogroll
Important Destinations
Subscribe Here :
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
July 20, 2010 at 10:45 am
Hello Paul and thank you so much for the deep insight you share so generously with your readers. As photo editor, I have to assign for the first time a couple of photographers to shoot portraits in 3D, not in the sense you talk about in your challenging interview, but simply using a technology which, still with glasses, will allow the viewer to see the images in 3D. I’m very suspicious about this method but I would like to have your opinion about it and to know if you forsee a future for this kind of technique.
July 20, 2010 at 2:34 pm
Chiara,
For some reason, 3D photography has never excited me, probably because photography, by nature is 2D, flat. 3D photography has been around for a long time, via different format, and has never really picked up. It’s more for games or sci fi websites. It’s a gimmick; I don’t see much future to it in photography world.
To me, the third dimension of photography is the emotion brought in by the talent of the photographer…the rest is artifact.
Let me know when it’s published. Would love to see the result.
Best
Paul M
July 22, 2010 at 7:15 am
Thank you so much for your answer which I will quote in the magazine on the occasion of the publication. I’ll send you a copy of the magazine. But please do not blame me: I have no choice…Best, Chiara