- alexa (7)
- Aurora (7)
- Canada (10)
- celebrity (121)
- CEPIC (30)
- Cnn (7)
- commercial stock (165)
- copyright (83)
- corbis (136)
- Corpocrates (13)
- Cosmos (3)
- digg (5)
- E Reader (13)
- editorial (360)
- filter (33)
- finance (144)
- flickr (91)
- focus (32)
- france (50)
- getty (240)
- Good Enough (9)
- google (58)
- gumgum (11)
- HOLGA (10)
- idee (17)
- IPTC (28)
- Jupiter (27)
- keyword (65)
- law (59)
- lens (39)
- lensbabies (9)
- license (214)
- magazine (197)
- Magnum (17)
- mediastorm (18)
- Microstock (171)
- Midstock (36)
- msnbc.com (14)
- multimedia (89)
- news (174)
- newspaper (79)
- Newsweek (17)
- No sense (63)
- PACA (26)
- Pacific coast news (8)
- photojournalism (247)
- Photoplus (3)
- photoshop (13)
- Piclens (3)
- pictogram (3)
- picturemaxx (2)
- Plus (10)
- prosumer (91)
- Royalty free (110)
- Search (109)
- SIPA (15)
- slideshow (78)
- Social Media (21)
- technology (236)
- TIME (36)
- transaction (158)
- Tweet (7)
- Uncategorized (27)
- Waste of time (8)
- web 2.0 (159)
- wire service (43)
- yahoo (14)
- Zymmetrical (6)
- February 7, 2012: Photography is killing photography
- January 25, 2012: iTune it
- December 14, 2011: How Empires fall
- December 7, 2011: Match it
- November 10, 2011: For whom the mallet falls
- November 1, 2011: The $$ Festival
- October 25, 2011: Algorithmic Photography
- October 21, 2011: A 100 years of solitude
- October 5, 2011: Requiem for a Giant
- September 25, 2011: For a buck or two
Blogroll
Important Destinations
Subscribe Here :
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Of photo pricing and air travel
It seems that these days, it is getting more important to be published than getting the appropriate compensation. More and more we hear about obscene prices being applied to licensing rights.
Fueled by the idea that photography is a commodity and thus should be priced accordingly, photo agencies worldwide are accepting rates that would make Wal Mart blush in shame. Twice this past week, I have heard about big traffic websites ( in the millions of unique visitors) paying a pathetic $5 per image. And this without any guarantee of quantity used . After, lets say, 50% paid back to the photographer, the $2.50 left will not even cover for the printing, postage and processing of the invoice !!!
Even companies selling commodities do sell them for a profit. Some photo agencies are confused between low price point/ high volume and non-for-profit.
Between Getty Images selling all you can eat monthly/yearly subscription package that, at least, guarantees them a minimum revenue and microstock pricing, it is easy to be confused. Add to this a complete misunderstanding of the “Long Tail” theory and you have lots and lots of lost souls. Finally, please remember that the extreme majority of photo agencies managers never made in, or out, of a business school. Seems their feet handle most of their pricing negotiation.
There is something else strongly in play here : it’s what I would call the “air travelers syndrome”. Someone taking a plane to anywhere these days is ready to accept almost any kind of situation as long as they get to destination. Hour delays, no food, poor service, cramp seating, nasty personnel, heavy security line, dirty planes, and so on. It is almost like holding your breath until you get out of the bad smell area. We deal with it because we really want to get to our destination. Possibly alive.
Photography pricing seems to be the same these days. As long as an image gets publish, we are ready to accept anything. Poor pricing, no quantity guarantees whatsoever, mistreatment , as long as the image gets to the “other side”.
Like air travel, we are happy and proud if we make it and the other passenger that was in line didn’t. Some sense of achievement and success. Some photo agencies will accept a bad deal just to close the door to the next one and be able to smile and wave from the window ” “Look, I am on board and not you, sucker !!”.
Not really a savvy business decision.
Bottom line: Having your images published at whatever cost is not a guarantee of success, as much as flying under any condition will guarantee you will get there. Both are very dangerous and can cause death. With the print world disappearing very fast, on-line sales will soon become the primary market. And with those prices, no one will make it to the other side.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
