<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guilty</title>
	<link>http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/12/guilty/</link>
	<description>Another Photo Industry blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dearmasa</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/12/guilty/#comment-2794</link>
		<author>dearmasa</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/12/guilty/#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>Daryl, no offense, but if "dozens" means more than 24 (which would be a mere "two" dozen), then I've clearly missed them! I did count five, though, including the one published on April 14, so I guess we should be grateful. Given that PDN attempts to cover so many aspects of the photo business world, we can hardly expect them to devote too much attention to these cases. 

Given that Paul not only wrote about it but called PDN and six photo membership groups, three of which Chris is a dues-paying member, to the carpet about not covering this story, *should* have generated additional coverage and not defensive replies. However, at least PDN did do a story, so thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl, no offense, but if &#8220;dozens&#8221; means more than 24 (which would be a mere &#8220;two&#8221; dozen), then I&#8217;ve clearly missed them! I did count five, though, including the one published on April 14, so I guess we should be grateful. Given that PDN attempts to cover so many aspects of the photo business world, we can hardly expect them to devote too much attention to these cases. </p>
<p>Given that Paul not only wrote about it but called PDN and six photo membership groups, three of which Chris is a dues-paying member, to the carpet about not covering this story, *should* have generated additional coverage and not defensive replies. However, at least PDN did do a story, so thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmelcher</title>
		<link>http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/12/guilty/#comment-2783</link>
		<author>pmelcher</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/12/guilty/#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>Daryl Lang of PDN,

You are right. However, you did not mention anything about this major recent development. Also, it would be appreciated if you did not send volatile emails around. It does not make you, or your publication, look very professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl Lang of PDN,</p>
<p>You are right. However, you did not mention anything about this major recent development. Also, it would be appreciated if you did not send volatile emails around. It does not make you, or your publication, look very professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

