Comments on: Under cover of the noise http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/03/under-cover-of-the-noise/ Another Photo Industry blog Tue, 22 May 2012 01:30:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: pmelcher http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/03/under-cover-of-the-noise/#comment-2769 pmelcher Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:29:07 +0000 http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/03/under-cover-of-the-noise/#comment-2769 @ Ed: The what is more important than the who. That is the reasons the names of the parties were not revealed. But it certainly not a secret. @ Ed:
The what is more important than the who. That is the reasons the names of the parties were not revealed. But it certainly not a secret.

]]> By: dearmasa http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/03/under-cover-of-the-noise/#comment-2768 dearmasa Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:14:57 +0000 http://blog.melchersystem.com/2009/04/03/under-cover-of-the-noise/#comment-2768 Thanks, Paul for bringing this story up. It is sad that no one in the industry (PDN, NPPA, etc) is following the story or frankly even knows the story is ongoing! The responses we've gotten on FaceBook are mostly, "dude, I thought this was over!" For anyone who is interested, the case is Chris Usher v. Corbis, the atty is Ed Greenberg, the jurisdiction is Federal Court, Southern District. Thanks again Paul... sometimes this whole experience feels like a tree falling in the forest. Adrienne Thanks, Paul for bringing this story up. It is sad that no one in the industry (PDN, NPPA, etc) is following the story or frankly even knows the story is ongoing! The responses we’ve gotten on FaceBook are mostly, “dude, I thought this was over!” For anyone who is interested, the case is Chris Usher v. Corbis, the atty is Ed Greenberg, the jurisdiction is Federal Court, Southern District. Thanks again Paul… sometimes this whole experience feels like a tree falling in the forest.

Adrienne

]]>