- alexa (6)
- Aurora (7)
- Canada (9)
- celebrity (100)
- CEPIC (29)
- Cnn (6)
- commercial stock (135)
- copyright (71)
- corbis (127)
- Corpocrates (1)
- Cosmos (3)
- digg (4)
- E Reader (10)
- editorial (304)
- filter (30)
- finance (113)
- flickr (83)
- focus (28)
- france (42)
- getty (220)
- google (55)
- gumgum (11)
- HOLGA (10)
- idee (15)
- IPTC (28)
- Jupiter (26)
- keyword (62)
- law (52)
- lens (37)
- lensbabies (8)
- license (170)
- magazine (169)
- Magnum (16)
- mediastorm (17)
- Microstock (153)
- Midstock (35)
- msnbc.com (14)
- multimedia (76)
- news (155)
- newspaper (70)
- Newsweek (16)
- No sense (56)
- PACA (26)
- Pacific coast news (6)
- photojournalism (214)
- Photoplus (3)
- photoshop (11)
- Piclens (3)
- pictogram (2)
- picturemaxx (2)
- Plus (8)
- prosumer (78)
- Royalty free (98)
- Search (86)
- SIPA (12)
- slideshow (66)
- Social Media (1)
- technology (201)
- TIME (31)
- transaction (129)
- Tweet (1)
- Uncategorized (26)
- Waste of time (1)
- web 2.0 (142)
- wire service (37)
- yahoo (14)
- Zymmetrical (6)
- July 29, 2010: Message in a Bottle
- July 26, 2010: Crowdtaste this !
- July 22, 2010: In search of Goodenough
- July 19, 2010: A genius talks
- July 15, 2010: I and them
- July 13, 2010: The Future of Photojournalism (Fixed)
- July 12, 2010: It's Official : Media and Photography Break up !!
- July 8, 2010: Getty hits a bump (and runs away)
- July 6, 2010: Of unintended consequences
- July 5, 2010: Photo burqa
Blogroll
Important Destinations
Subscribe Here :
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
“This is our company together.”
Daryl Lang is a lucky guy. He gets invited to Corbis’s secret meeting on rooftops. And not me. I wonder why ?
Corbis executive team, apparently out for a week-end stroll, decided to inform some lost contributors that, in effort to make the company profitable, after only 15 years of trying, they would cut photographers royalties. Their logic is simple. After an apparently doom and gloom presentation about the future of the industry, how it will shrink to a peanut size, they declare that the only solution is to reduce the commission pay-out to photographers.
Make sense for a Starbucks Latte induced Seattle executive .
The logic is clear cut: “we (Corbis) expect less revenue thus we will give you ( photographers) even less. After all, we are in it together.” However, there will be no salary cut for the senior management . If Steve Davis legacy is intact, the current CEO must be close to $800,000 a year with other senior execs making in the $400,000. But their salaries will no be touched. After all, continuing to run a company that has NEVER posted a profit and making sure it doesn’t should be rewarded well.
The rooftop meeting apparently welcomed a slide show by Mr Shenk who, according to that lucky, lucky Daryl Lang “ …forecasted that the total stock image licensing business will fall from $2.3 billion dollars in 2007 to $2.2 billion in 2011.”
No mentioned was made about the source of these wacky pretty numbers and what they included or didn’t. But what it shows is that Corbis has no intention of taking more market shares and will just ride the wave of this downfall. Cool !!. What a great company that is. They cut staff, they cut royalty to “some” photographers, the ones apparently most impacted by Corbis lack of sales, and they announce that they will do nothing to grow. However, they will keep more of what is left.
No one mentioned, for example, the web ready Corbis-Veer new pricing at $40, $9 less then Getty’s . It would have been nice to ask if this was a company wide policy to slash prices too.
The leisure, casual, dress-down-Friday meeting was apparently a new corporate attempt to make contributing photographers swallow a hard pill. And it seems it will work. Pro stockers, desperate to make any revenue at all, will seemingly accept anything these days. Even the fact that they could make 70% royalty if they moved to Snapvillage, the midstock arm of Corbis, or if they switch to shooting celebrity portraits and belong to the Outline brand.
There is a class system being instituted at the Bill Gates photo agency with photographers receiving different types of royalty based on what they shoot. You are a complete amateur, you get 70% of a growing market. You are a season pro, you get 40% of a declining one.
It is doubtful that any photographers will leave the paper tiger, as there are no alternatives anymore. If anything, Getty will continue to trim its contributing sources in order to keep the best. With the successive failure of all co op photo agencies models, the ineffectiveness of the trade associations and the impossible tasks left to the medium size agencies, its a grim horizon facing pro stockers. But then again, it always was: “This is our company together.” Ya, right.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
