Categories
- alexa (5)
- Aurora (2)
- Canada (7)
- celebrity (31)
- CEPIC (16)
- Cnn (3)
- commercial stock (24)
- copyright (30)
- corbis (87)
- Cosmos (1)
- digg (4)
- editorial (141)
- filter (17)
- finance (42)
- flickr (52)
- focus (13)
- france (21)
- getty (130)
- google (24)
- gumgum (7)
- HOLGA (8)
- idee (8)
- IPTC (13)
- Jupiter (17)
- keyword (39)
- law (23)
- lens (13)
- lensbabies (8)
- license (55)
- magazine (52)
- Magnum (5)
- mediastorm (12)
- Microstock (87)
- Midstock (21)
- msnbc.com (9)
- multimedia (34)
- news (72)
- newspaper (30)
- Newsweek (4)
- No sense (27)
- PACA (12)
- Pacific coast news (3)
- photojournalism (89)
- Photoplus (1)
- photoshop (6)
- Piclens (2)
- pictogram (1)
- picturemaxx (1)
- Plus (3)
- prosumer (38)
- Royalty free (60)
- Search (48)
- SIPA (6)
- slideshow (27)
- technology (64)
- TIME (12)
- transaction (52)
- Uncategorized (20)
- web 2.0 (71)
- wire service (19)
- yahoo (10)
- Zymmetrical (6)
Latest Postings
- August 28, 2008: Save photography
- August 22, 2008: Running for cover
- August 19, 2008: The Photo Indigestion
- August 12, 2008: 10 Misconceptions about photography
- August 8, 2008: Damn, What is wrong with you people ?
- August 6, 2008: The photography bubble ?
- August 4, 2008: Officially, it is
- July 29, 2008: another perl
- July 29, 2008: Jupiter is not responding
- July 27, 2008: A prime minister's host
Links
Blogroll
Important Destinations
Subscribe Here :
Archives
Is that why ?
News of the sudden departure of Mary Ann Golan from the position of Director of photography might be link to this cover ?

The image comes from a Shutterstock / Istockphoto contributor and was licensed for legendary pennies. Microstock on the cover of Time magazine sure is a milestone. It would be interesting to know if it was the image or the cost that was behind the decision to use this image.
More on this image and the reactions here.
3 Responses to “Is that why ?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


June 5, 2008 at 4:26 pm
For as outrageous as this might have been in the past, how can anyone be surprised by this now? At this point in the game, what difference does it make if the image was licensed for pennies through iStockphoto or given freely to Time magazine by a Flickr user.
June 6, 2008 at 7:47 am
To some of us, it matters…
June 6, 2008 at 7:33 pm
This is evidence that, like it or not, SOME microstock offerings are in the same league as RM.