You are currently browsing the Thoughts of a Bohemian weblog archives for the day March 1, 2008.
- alexa (7)
- Aurora (7)
- Canada (10)
- celebrity (121)
- CEPIC (30)
- Cnn (7)
- commercial stock (165)
- copyright (83)
- corbis (136)
- Corpocrates (13)
- Cosmos (3)
- digg (5)
- E Reader (13)
- editorial (360)
- filter (33)
- finance (144)
- flickr (91)
- focus (32)
- france (50)
- getty (240)
- Good Enough (9)
- google (58)
- gumgum (11)
- HOLGA (10)
- idee (17)
- IPTC (28)
- Jupiter (27)
- keyword (65)
- law (59)
- lens (39)
- lensbabies (9)
- license (214)
- magazine (197)
- Magnum (17)
- mediastorm (18)
- Microstock (171)
- Midstock (36)
- msnbc.com (14)
- multimedia (89)
- news (174)
- newspaper (79)
- Newsweek (17)
- No sense (63)
- PACA (26)
- Pacific coast news (8)
- photojournalism (247)
- Photoplus (3)
- photoshop (13)
- Piclens (3)
- pictogram (3)
- picturemaxx (2)
- Plus (10)
- prosumer (91)
- Royalty free (110)
- Search (109)
- SIPA (15)
- slideshow (78)
- Social Media (21)
- technology (236)
- TIME (36)
- transaction (158)
- Tweet (7)
- Uncategorized (27)
- Waste of time (8)
- web 2.0 (159)
- wire service (43)
- yahoo (14)
- Zymmetrical (6)
- February 7, 2012: Photography is killing photography
- January 25, 2012: iTune it
- December 14, 2011: How Empires fall
- December 7, 2011: Match it
- November 10, 2011: For whom the mallet falls
- November 1, 2011: The $$ Festival
- October 25, 2011: Algorithmic Photography
- October 21, 2011: A 100 years of solitude
- October 5, 2011: Requiem for a Giant
- September 25, 2011: For a buck or two
Blogroll
Important Destinations
Subscribe Here :
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Archive for March 1, 2008
A quick Question
March 1, 2008 by pmelcher.
Where is the sales director ? who is in charge of pricing at Getty ? Don’t they have a “price director” like mythical company Corbis ?
Think about it. A bit less than a year ago, they purchased Mediavast, owners of Filmagic, Wireimage and Contour for a cool $200 million. Agregated with the already existing Getty and AFP ( distributed by Getty in the USA) content, they have a hold on the best, most extensive celebrity content in the USA. And the USA is the motherland of the greatest world celebrities.
Getty and Mediavast has sole access to most and majority of all celebrity events. They have exclusive access to parties, events, and have prime location for everything else where they are not exclusive. To top it all, they have some of the best celebrity photographers ever to have walked this earth.
One would have thought that two things would have happened by now :
- A heavy increase in pricing. After all, it is almost impossible to publish a celebrity magazine or website anywhere in the world, without access to Getty’s content.
- A disappearance of its competition, at least on the red carpets of America.
None have happened. The fact that the rise in pricing has not increase is a complete mystery to me. What is the point to secure all this content and priviledge access and distribute as a common content ? I understand that selling subscriptions is what Getty is all about but what about profit ? Couldn’t they sell premium subscription for a much higher price with better content? Or, put some coverage out of the subscription and sell it individually at a premium ?
Mediavast has fought the market share battle already, bradding images in exchange for exposure. Getty does not need to brand itself anymore. So why keep to low pricing ? Or are some of the Getty executives asleep at the wheel ?
There is more photographers now at red carpet event than there has ever been. Why is that, Getty ? Shouldn’t you be in such a strong position by now that no one would even consider competing ? Its is the opposite, it has become more crowded . And every photographer, almost, is double, triple dipping, giving his material to two or three different small agencies to hopefully maximize their chances to sell.
So, again, what is going on in the heads of the corporates ? Brain freeze ? is the Corbis virus is spreading ?
Posted in celebrity, magazine, technology, license, newspaper, corbis, editorial, transaction, getty | Print | No Comments »
